Tuesday, September 7, 2021

Recent Questions - English Language & Usage Stack Exchange

Recent Questions - English Language & Usage Stack Exchange

Recent Questions - English Language & Usage Stack Exchange


What is the effect of using dashes between each word in a sentence?

Posted: 07 Sep 2021 10:38 AM PDT

In The Bluest Eye, there is a quote:

Grown people frowned and fussed: 'You-don't-know- how-to-take-care-of-nothing. I-never-had-a-baby-doll-in-my-whole-life-and-used-to-cry-my-eyes-out-for-them. Now-you-got-one-a-beautiful-one-and-you-tear-it-up-what's-the-matter-with-you?'

When reading, I was a bit confused and curious as to Morrison's choice of dashing between each word. Could someone, perhaps, elaborate on this choice?

In context, the quote is being said by African-American adults towards an African-American little girl, with the location being Ohio.

What is the meaning of the sentence - "I was living my own metaphor" [migrated]

Posted: 07 Sep 2021 10:21 AM PDT

I just started reading the book "The Alchemist". In the beginning, the author is talking about how no one was buying his book. He writes - "But I never lost faith in the book or ever wavered in my vision. Why? Because it was me in there, all of me, heart and soul. I was living my own metaphor." Here, what does it mean when the author says that he was living his own metaphor.

How do I use a conjunction to join two clauses directly after a list of terms?

Posted: 07 Sep 2021 10:13 AM PDT

I am trying to offer a choice between two options, the first of which has several sub-options. I'm unsure how to express this in a grammatically correct and clear manner.

What I have currently is basically

Access some data in category one, category two, or category three, or create your own category.

The two main options are "access" or "create", and "access" has options "one, two, or three".

Does this structure make sense as written? If not, how can it be improved for clarity?

Is there a word for an object that you don't recognize outside of a specific depiction of it? [closed]

Posted: 07 Sep 2021 10:06 AM PDT

I was messing around on the internet when I saw a picture of an eraser on a white background, and it took me a good few seconds to realize that this eraser, without any kind of visual context, was an eraser, I just thought it was some sort of random shape. Is there a word for items like this?

What is the one-word synonym for "less crowded" in English?

Posted: 07 Sep 2021 09:39 AM PDT

This is really funny! I've been searching about this for a while now. I think it should be a very frequent word that I can instantly recognize upon hearing but no words come to my mind. Let's say there is a park which is very crowded on the weekends and not so much on workdays. How would you describe the park in those days that not too many people go?

How would you fill the sentence "The park is [blank] today!"?

My problem with "less crowded" is that it's not really the actual word but rather we're trying to convey the meaning by using its antonym. It's like calling a well-lit place "not dark." It is true but there is already a direct word for that meaning. Upon searching I found some other words that could fill the blank like "secluded" or "solitude." But I feel like "secluded" is a place that is always empty of people. Not a place that is less crowded from time to time. You cannot say the park is secluded today! That sounds ridiculous to me! There are also words like "vacant" that seem like overkill. I guess there are no people (or maybe a handful of people) in a vacant place.

I have a unique word for this in my own native language and when somebody asked me for its equivalence in English, I really couldn't figure it out.

How to figure out about if country is a place or thing [closed]

Posted: 07 Sep 2021 08:26 AM PDT

I can not figure out if country is a place or thing.

Is this joke really ironic or is it just a joke? [closed]

Posted: 07 Sep 2021 08:58 AM PDT

Most jokes are not meant to be taken seriously nor literally. But that doesn't automatically make it irony, even if the definition of irony is "saying one thing and meaning another".

Example.

Y is making up a story (lying). It is very obvious that is not true, but Y wants the audience to think that it's true.

Y: Yesterday when I was at the restaurant and said this …, it ended with them dying of laughter and I didn't have to pay for my food"

X:"Yes, it's true. I was there, believe it or not. Everybody in the restaurant was giving a standing ovation and the waitresses were shouting and dancing."

The exaggeration implies that X's statement is not true and is said to show how unrealistic Y's story is. When someone asked if she was serious she replied "I was being ironic". 


Was X really ironic, or was she just making a joke?

Another example could be:

A: there are several countries in the world that do not have any food at all, so you have to finish your plate.

B: What country doesn't have any food?

C: Africa

Is C also ironic? He obviously knows it's not true, and the joke relies on stereotypes and wrong terminology. If that is irony, isn't most punchlines ironic (if it's not a pun and that kind of thing) ?

Usage of the phrase "I haven't seen anything like this in my entire career" [closed]

Posted: 07 Sep 2021 07:08 AM PDT

I was having a discussion with a friend on how the phrase "I haven't seen anything like this in my entire career" should be used and who would be the appropriate person to use it.

My opinion was that this ideally should be used by a person who has had long enough experience in a field, else it sounds pompous and a little ridiculous. Also the whole point of making this statement would be to either emphasise how ridiculous the situation was or how great a job someone had done.

By my friend had a different opinion , stating that anyone could use this expression and it does not necessarily mean to highlight how great or how bad the situation was, instead it could be simply used in place of "I've never seen anything like this before" just to express that the person hadn't experienced or seen this before as in the thing was new, and not to express any particular reaction to the situation.

What would be the situation or person to use that phrase?

Is there a term for someone who takes a long time explaining simple things? [duplicate]

Posted: 07 Sep 2021 08:57 AM PDT

Is there a term for someone who takes a long time to explain simple things, but goes through the complicated ones very briefly?

We had a refresher course on a software we already use, the presenter took a long time to go over some basic forms that everyone already knew how to use, but explained the tricky stuff very briefly. At the end of the meeting the presenter got flooded with questions.

I've seen this before. Is there a word / term /phrase for this?


(Edit) Some comments from the participants:
  • He only explored the surface

  • We only saw the tip of the iceberg

Meaning Of "A Town That Still Feels Hundreds Of Years Old"?

Posted: 07 Sep 2021 05:45 AM PDT

Given the example:

Virginia is also home to Williamsburg, a town that still feels hundreds of years old. Visit Virginia to see history.

Confused about the construction of a sentence [closed]

Posted: 07 Sep 2021 05:11 AM PDT

Today I came across this sentence: "He talks clear and witty." Is it a grammatically correct sentence?

Do these statements convey different information or are they essentially the same . If they are different please clarify their usage. Thanks [duplicate]

Posted: 07 Sep 2021 04:45 AM PDT

Statement A:

In pursuit of greater autonomy and power, many capable and efficient nobles shattered the Empire by carving out their own principalities.

Statement B

Many capable and efficient nobles fractured the Empire by carving out their own principalities in search of more autonomy and power.

What is the meaning of “awe”? [closed]

Posted: 07 Sep 2021 04:42 AM PDT

According to Oxford dictionary:

Awe /ɔː/: feelings of respect and slight fear; feelings of being very impressed by something/somebody

My question: How do one have feelings of respect and slight fear at the same time? What cause this feeling?

Yourself vs By yourself/On your own

Posted: 07 Sep 2021 04:57 AM PDT

I'm confused with this sentence:

Do they give you the topic or can you choose it [...]

So my book says the correct answer is "yourself". Is it grammatically incorrect to use "By yourself/On your own" in the sentence?

If these two options are both correct, is there any difference between them in this case?

Meaning of "It is also a mile high up in the sky."

Posted: 07 Sep 2021 03:45 AM PDT

Given the example:

Denver is the capital of Colorado. It is also a mile high up in the sky. It is called the "Mile High City."

What's the correct form of the word "esoterics", it being a subject? [duplicate]

Posted: 07 Sep 2021 01:14 AM PDT

What noun would one use to define the whole area of esoteric related matters? In some dictionaries, it is "Esoteric" or "Esotericism", in others - "Esoterics" or "Esoterica". Which of them are the most appropriate?

For example, an "Esoterics and Parapsycology Training Centre" (a centre where they study such subjects as parapsychology and esoterics). Which that be correct: esoteric or esoterics?

Or "a diploma in Esoterica".

How should the correct version sound?

Looking for an appropriate idiomatic phrase "the joy in competing" or similar

Posted: 07 Sep 2021 06:27 AM PDT

I'm looking for an idiomatic phrase that lies between "the thrill of victory" and "the agony of defeat", in the competition itself, enjoying it for its own sake -- something like "the joy in competing" (which gets a few thousand Google hits, but not loads.) Otherwise I could go with something like "competing for the sake of enjoyment".

Does anything else come to mind?

An appropriate word for a mathematical object

Posted: 07 Sep 2021 04:53 AM PDT

I am looking for a word to call a mathematical object. This object is the intersection of infinitely many sets (indeed balls), to distinguish this object which is a set we need to give it a name. I would appreciate any suggestion.

Why should we go ahead? [closed]

Posted: 07 Sep 2021 12:16 AM PDT

"Go ahead" has been used for a long time as a form of giving permission. For example in an instructional setting the instructor explains a task, then says "Now go ahead with the task". Or in the context "Can I ask you a question?" "Go ahead".

In the past years I've been noticing this expression to gain ground. US content creators and instructors nowadays hardly ever seem to do anything or instruct others to do, they go ahead. As in "I will now go ahead and open this application. Then I will go ahead and create a new file. Next I'll go ahead and create a heading" and so on; you get the picture. I don't remember this being nearly as prevalent in the aughts.

So what's the deal - just adding fluff to increase the length of the video?

What is the modern equivalent of "caitiff"? [closed]

Posted: 07 Sep 2021 12:09 AM PDT

Even though words such as scoundrel, caitiff, or dastard aren't exactly archaic, you don't hear them much in today's conversation. Not much.

That said, the all-encompassing asshole is too general, I think, in the sense that it can mean a whole lot of different things.

Is there a contemporary term for a despicable person hellbent on committing base and/or dishonorable acts?

What would make grammatic sense: DC current or just DC, when describing type of current?

Posted: 07 Sep 2021 09:27 AM PDT

I am writing about currents like AC and DC types. AC stands for Alternating Current and DC stands for Direct Current. Would it make sense when writing if i wrote like this: "I am going to use DC current" or "I am going to use DC"? It sounds grammatically wrong when saying "DC current", because i am repeating current twice in an expanded form of DC. But when saying just "DC", it also sounds wrong, because I'm not describing what DC is.

Can you please tell me which is the correct form? Thanks for your time.

Is it in­cor­rect to use things you have a pair of in the sin­gu­lar like “this pants is, this glasses is, this scis­sors is”? Can I do it any­way?

Posted: 07 Sep 2021 05:28 AM PDT

I my­self al­ways use the sin­gu­lar for things that comes in pairs such as pants, glasses, scis­sors and the like be­cause I am re­fer­ring to what­ever I am talk­ing about as one sin­gu­lar unit not two units.

That is, my pref­er­ence for:

  1. Where ❓❓is my glasses? I must have put ❓❓it some­where around here.

Over:

  1. Where are my glasses? I must have put them some­where around here.

Be­cause to me the glasses as in one sin­gu­lar pair of eye­glasses used as one unit counts as not two but just one sin­gle phys­i­cal ob­ject.

I re­al­ize this might not be cor­rect, but to me feels more log­i­cally ac­cu­rate.

Does this sound wrong to na­tive speak­ers? If it does, can I do it any­way?

What is the difference in meaning between these two sentences? Is there any at all? [closed]

Posted: 07 Sep 2021 02:48 AM PDT

What is the difference in meaning between these two sentences? (Assume that his first game at the club is not in the distant future.)

He is looking forward to play his first game at the club.

He is looking forward to playing his first game at the club.

Ways to convey a sense of attentiveness and responsiveness to something beyond your control?

Posted: 07 Sep 2021 04:56 AM PDT

What are metaphors or English sayings for conveying a sense of attentiveness and responsiveness to something?

I am particularly interested in something akin to "emotion surfing" as it conveys:

  1. the waves are out of your control,
  2. you pay attention to them so you can respond to them
  3. you do it by choice (often because it is important to you).

I want to find a metaphor (that isn't overused) to convey staying in contact with something in an attentive way so that you "get something out of it" like a surfer rides a wave. It's important that there is an element of "going with the flow" because struggling against it is as futile as trying to control waves on the ocean. It would also be helpful to capture a sense of temporality in the same way that ocean waves perpetually rise and fall.

Thematic comparison of 'collaborative' vs 'collective' in literature or culture

Posted: 07 Sep 2021 05:02 AM PDT

I'm trying to brand a product with either the word 'collaborative' or 'collective', but I am having trouble imagining what the well known thematic usage is with either word. I've always seen them used interchangeably.

The definitions seem pretty similar:

  • collaborative: produced or conducted by two or more parties working together.

    • "collaborative research"
  • collective: done by people acting as a group.

    • "a collective protest"

My guess is that someone with a literature or world history background would be able to help me parse the difference or nuance I'm trying to identify.

What do you call a person who is guided by someone or something else in a mentor/assistent manner?

Posted: 07 Sep 2021 08:57 AM PDT

If a tourist is guided through a city by a tour guide, what would be the term to use to refer to that tourist as a function of the guiding? Best I can come up with is guided one, but that sounds a bit bland. Are there any better terms for this? I'm looking for a term that can be used in a context where the term is the only thing that indicates guidance.

some context about the guidance:

The guide has a subordinate role, providing sensory information and advice to the person being guided. The person being guided is less a follower and more a master, but I don't want to use the term master because that feels too much like slavery. It's also not really a student/teacher relationship, because the information flows the wrong direction for that. Essentially, the guide has a role somewhere between mentor and assistent, and it's that role that I want to reflect in the term.

example:

"The [Word] was suddenly stopped by the tour guide".

"The [Word] was accompanied by his guide animal."

"The [Word] was on a tour of the building he helped fund."

"A [Word] can only receive guidance from 1 ancestor at a time." (context that I want to use it in in my book).

"A [Word] has heightened senses and an increased capacity for both abstract and logical thought."

Meaning and interpretation of Bilbo's "half as well" quote

Posted: 07 Sep 2021 10:27 AM PDT

In The Lord of The Rings, Bilbo says the following to his assembled guests at his eleventy first birthday party:

I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve.

What is the meaning of this quote? Is there more than one way to interpret it?

Usage of the slang "a man Friday" in English conversation

Posted: 07 Sep 2021 01:42 AM PDT

Our Boss was talking with someone and he said,

The office clerk typist is our man Friday.

Does the Boss mean the clerk typist is the person who he/she trust?

And can I use this slang for a woman?

The office clerk typist is our woman Friday.

"Magic" versus "magical"

Posted: 07 Sep 2021 07:41 AM PDT

Two-part question. We say magic wand and magical creature, and swapping the adjectives sound wrong, even if they are technically right.

  1. Are there rules about which one to use, or is this a classic "use whatever sounds right" situation?
  2. Can anyone explain how a single adjective comes to be "modified" like this depending on context? Is there a linguistic term for this?

"Where do you get off...?" Origin

Posted: 07 Sep 2021 10:30 AM PDT

I remembered a phrase this morning "Where do you get off...?" (last entry), which is similar to "Who do you think you are...?" or "What gives you the right to...?" or "How dare you...?".

Due to its scarcity in my favorite online dictionaries, I wondered if the phrase was new. But it's been used as early as 1913.

Wanting to know its origin I found this discussion with several good ideas, including "Where do you get off...?" being:

  • The same as "Where (on Earth) could you get away with...?"
  • About transportation, whether related to ego trip or a physical stop of some importance
  • Related to Schadenfreude

But the discussion is informal. Is there formal evidence for what the original implication of "Where do you get off...?" was?

No comments:

Post a Comment