Recent Questions - English Language & Usage Stack Exchange |
- whip’s gotta be full-on
- using me and I in a sentence [duplicate]
- What does "expensive dinosaur" means?
- "i am the co-founder" or "i am a co-founder"?
- "Would" for Habitual Actions [migrated]
- Is it grammatically ok to capitalize first letters of important phrases?
- Article use in English (America) [duplicate]
- Is there one simple word which means the inverse of the word "apply"? [closed]
- Cambridge IELTS 13 General Training's answer looks incorrect [closed]
- Why did the writer use a comma in this construction? [closed]
- How does one differentiate a "conceptual metaphor" from other kinds of metaphor?
- (Rather than) as a conjunction
- "Something won't happen because something is good." It seems the 'something is good' would affect the first 'Something' negatively but doesn't
- 'may be' or 'might be'?
- Pronunciation of ‘-eru’
- Repair verb with present perfect and present perfect continuous
- What is the difference between register, subscribe, sign up and opt-in?
- What is the best way to reword the parenthetical plural "diagnosis(es) and remedy(s)"?
- How do you say that "while" is frequently followed by past continuous?
- Recognizing phrases with determiners
- Any one thing: syntactic analysis
- Can the adverb "strongly" be use with the verb "try"? If not, is there a clear reason?
- Is "Not that we would have expected anything else, of course" sound?
- to shame something out of someone
- Use of The Verb "LIKE"
- Why is it called zero conditional?
- I want to use a definition from dictionary.com but I can't find it anywhere else.
- "PIN Number" — why do we say it?
Posted: 14 Mar 2022 09:18 AM PDT I would like to know the meaning of "whip's gotta be full-on European luxury" in the context below. Is it something like: the car is going to be full of European luxury goods? Thanks The minute I started getting smart about my finances was the moment I finally got into the driver's seat of my life. And you know that if I'm going to drive, then the whip's gotta be full-on European luxury. | ||||||||||||||
using me and I in a sentence [duplicate] Posted: 14 Mar 2022 09:05 AM PDT Which one is technically correct and most used: "John and me are going to the store." or "John and I are going to the store." | ||||||||||||||
What does "expensive dinosaur" means? Posted: 14 Mar 2022 08:55 AM PDT I'm studying english watching a netflix drama "Emily in Paris". I don't understand that mean of "expensive dinosaur" in a conversation. Emily is working for Savoir as marketing company. Olivia Thompon in Duree's CMO. (Duree is a cosmetic company) Duree was used to be a client of Savior. Olivia wanted to hire Emily as an influencer to promote Duree products. Emily declined an offer and suggested that work with Savoir to Olivia. Olivia said "I fired your agency. They're a very expensive dinosaur" Is it an idiom? Could you let me know how to understand it? | ||||||||||||||
"i am the co-founder" or "i am a co-founder"? Posted: 14 Mar 2022 09:27 AM PDT I and my business partner are co-founders of our business. When we write emails what is best practice to describe our positions? "I am the co-founder" or "I am a co-founder" The former makes (imo) it sound like I am "the" co-founder, as in the only one. But the latter does not sound as good :D Which is better? | ||||||||||||||
"Would" for Habitual Actions [migrated] Posted: 14 Mar 2022 07:18 AM PDT I would like to ask if the first "would" in this sentence is correct: "Every time she would come to our house, she would talk to Mom about that subject." Thank you so much! | ||||||||||||||
Is it grammatically ok to capitalize first letters of important phrases? Posted: 14 Mar 2022 09:32 AM PDT Say I am writing an article on something like the Riemann integral or morphogenesis. I have two questions regarding capitalization.
I feel like the 'integral' is as much part of the name of the thing as the mathematician Lebesgue it was named after and I would like to emphasise that. And speaking of emphasis:
It might be because I am german and we capitalize the first letter of nouns in general but I feel like this makes the word more significant and makes the writing more understandable in this way. (Ah, we are talking primarily about morphogenesis and not primarily about membranes.) | ||||||||||||||
Article use in English (America) [duplicate] Posted: 14 Mar 2022 05:20 AM PDT When we should not use "The" article before of phrase? I am confused when I have to use "The" or not before a construction like this noun+of+noun. | ||||||||||||||
Is there one simple word which means the inverse of the word "apply"? [closed] Posted: 14 Mar 2022 07:11 AM PDT I am looking for a simple word which would mean the opposite of the word "apply". The first thing that comes to my mind is "unapply". But I am not sure if it is elegant and maybe there is something better? I have curves on my chart and I want to update those curves with another curve (not create a new curve on the chart but I want the old curve to be updated with new values from the other curve). So in that case I would say: "Apply other curve in (or on) old curve". And now I need to say to do opposite, so probably "Subtract other curve from old curve" would be ok. But I was wondering if there is any special word corresponding exactly to "apply". | ||||||||||||||
Cambridge IELTS 13 General Training's answer looks incorrect [closed] Posted: 14 Mar 2022 03:46 AM PDT Hi guys, I am doing IELTS 13 - Test 3 - Reading. The question #2 say "An ability to read music is essential". My answer is "false". The correct answer given by the book is "true". I think the book's answer is incorrect because the 2nd paragraph states "Pariticipants should have basic music reading skills". Based on RFC2219, "Should" is not "must", meaning it doesn't require the thing. Meanwhile, "essential" means necessary or needed, it's more likely so important that one can't live without. As I understand, "should" in that context means whether you have music reading skills does not matter. Am I correct? | ||||||||||||||
Why did the writer use a comma in this construction? [closed] Posted: 14 Mar 2022 07:16 AM PDT Usually we don't use a comma before because, except when the comma is a must to clear the meaning of the sentence. But l wonder why the writer uses a comma before because in this construction. He was drunk, because he had to support himself on a friend's arm. | ||||||||||||||
How does one differentiate a "conceptual metaphor" from other kinds of metaphor? Posted: 14 Mar 2022 01:58 AM PDT There is a rather long list of metaphors: standard (stock) metaphors, extended metaphors, visual metaphors, implied metaphors, mixed metaphors, allegorical metaphors, absolute metaphors dead metaphors, etc. In terms of all having one property in common, I have (thus far) read that they all involve a transfer of quality (from one item/idea to another) in some way. I have not found a lengthy, detailed discussion on this topic. Can these other types of metaphor be (in some way) subsumed under the "conceptual metaphor"? And what are the characteristics that differentiate a conceptual metaphor from these other kinds of metaphor? | ||||||||||||||
(Rather than) as a conjunction Posted: 13 Mar 2022 11:06 PM PDT It is said that, as a conjunction, the two constructions on each side of (rather than) must be parallel. So can this phrase join two sentences like this? (I know there are better ways of doing it) Ex: I will tell her rather than she tell me. | ||||||||||||||
Posted: 13 Mar 2022 10:19 PM PDT I am writing about minimal web design, and these are the first lines I wrote: Minimalism was one of the major web design trends throughout the 2010s. And it likely won't fade away in the 2020s because it's a fundamentally solid concept. I want to say 'minimalism won't go away because minimalism is a good concept to build websites upon.' The way I've written my sentence, it seems I am saying, 'Minimalism is a fundamentally solid concept, but that won't affect its popularity.' Or am I reading it wrong, and the sentences are perfectly alright for communicating the message I want to communicate? | ||||||||||||||
Posted: 13 Mar 2022 09:39 PM PDT If I share my teacher's instructions with a friend from another class do I say Is there a way to know which one to use when? | ||||||||||||||
Posted: 14 Mar 2022 04:13 AM PDT I've just come across the word 'glomerular' and I'm genuinely irked by how difficult it is to pronounce the eru bit. It seems online that the r is omitted, turning it into more of a yuh sound. Does anyone have any idea why this particular combination is so tricky? | ||||||||||||||
Repair verb with present perfect and present perfect continuous Posted: 13 Mar 2022 10:07 PM PDT I have been working on tenses of English and I have been confusing about present perfect and present perfect continuous. So, I wonder about the repair verb with present perfect and present perfect continuous.
and
If I didn't repair my bike in past and I am still keeping this behavior, I have to use present perfect continuous. But I saw someone use present perfect in many source. The _English Grammar in Use book uses both sentences dependent on content. So, when we select appropriate tense, must we decide depending on content? Which is correct? | ||||||||||||||
What is the difference between register, subscribe, sign up and opt-in? Posted: 14 Mar 2022 01:10 AM PDT What the difference between these words ?
I'm creating a website registration page and was wondering what name to use in the URL | ||||||||||||||
What is the best way to reword the parenthetical plural "diagnosis(es) and remedy(s)"? Posted: 14 Mar 2022 12:33 AM PDT What is the best way to word the following sentence?
Since diagnosis ends in -is, should the parenthetical plural "diagnosis(es)" be something else? I could reword but it sounds a little...wordy. Plus, if not also spelled out, "remedy(s)" then seems inconsistent:
| ||||||||||||||
How do you say that "while" is frequently followed by past continuous? Posted: 14 Mar 2022 09:01 AM PDT I usually explain grammar in private lessons and there's an expression I would like to know. Thanks! | ||||||||||||||
Recognizing phrases with determiners Posted: 14 Mar 2022 01:06 AM PDT I've just started learning syntax, from Jim Miller's Edinburgh introduction. Please answer for Miller's analysis, if possible. Currently, I am concerned I'm being too zealous in recognizing new phrases and heads. E.g. in
the determiner, 'my', can I think be omitted, which I believe is one of his tests for being a phrase. But then the noun also seems to pass a test for being a phrase, conjunction:
I also wondered if the answer means that the determiner and its noun can be separated in a clause.
Which reads like poor English: but why? Specifically, if both 'plants' and 'my' are phrases, then why aren't they syntactically independent enough to separate? | ||||||||||||||
Any one thing: syntactic analysis Posted: 13 Mar 2022 08:07 PM PDT
| ||||||||||||||
Can the adverb "strongly" be use with the verb "try"? If not, is there a clear reason? Posted: 14 Mar 2022 07:03 AM PDT It doesn't seem to me to be possible to use the adverb "strongly" in connection with the verb "try" but I can't figure out why not. It feels as it it ought to be possible but never sounds right. Is this a correct observation and if so is there a clear linguistic reason for this? The obvious answer is to use the adverb "hard", but why not "strongly"? | ||||||||||||||
Is "Not that we would have expected anything else, of course" sound? Posted: 13 Mar 2022 10:05 PM PDT In the GSMArena article Xiaomi denies any ties to the Chinese military in response to being blacklisted by the US, "would have" is used:
I am not a native speaker, and this feels odd. Why not just say the following?
| ||||||||||||||
to shame something out of someone Posted: 13 Mar 2022 11:06 PM PDT What does "to shame something out of someone" mean? Specially in this sentence by Walt Whitman:
Does it mean the look of the bay mare shames him, because he realizes that how much silliness he has? The full stanza:
| ||||||||||||||
Posted: 14 Mar 2022 08:00 AM PDT Consider the following sentence, please:
How would a native speaker of English analyze the above sentence? I tried to analyze it myself in the following ways: 1) I don't like these comments that are coming from you, with a relative clause at the end and probably an emphasis on the phrase 'these comments.' 2) I don't like these comments' coming from you, with an apostrophe after 'comments', meaning "I don't like the fact that they are coming from you." 'coming from you' functions as a gerund phrase here. 3) I don't like (these comments) and also (the fact that they're coming from you), with "LIKE" as a di-transitive verb and the two bracketed parts as its two objects. An analogy can be drawn with the verb "see" in the following sentence: "I saw him doing this." So, my question is: To a native speaker, which one/ones seems/seem correct. I know a proper context could limit the number of analyses of the given sentence. But, without a given context, in how many possible ways the above sentence could be interpreted by a native speaker is of my concern. Thank you in advance. | ||||||||||||||
Why is it called zero conditional? Posted: 14 Mar 2022 07:50 AM PDT What's the meaning of the zero conditional or the first or the second .. Does it mean the form of the verb and what does that exactly mean does it mean infinitive although the present simple is used! so what does the numbers in the .. conditional mean? | ||||||||||||||
I want to use a definition from dictionary.com but I can't find it anywhere else. Posted: 14 Mar 2022 12:03 AM PDT My essay is about the Greek Tragedy "Oedipus the king". I want to use the term cosmic irony in a paraphrase but I am unsure whether or not it would weaken my argument. Since I can not find support for this idea in another credible website.
My sentence would be: "Consequently, this demonstrates how fate victimizes Oedipus and hints the idea of cosmic irony" then followed by a quote/paraphrase of the definition. Should I use this term or not? Would there be a better way to phrase my argument? | ||||||||||||||
"PIN Number" — why do we say it? Posted: 14 Mar 2022 07:43 AM PDT We often say "PIN Number", this is part of everyday conversation. But why? PIN stands for Personal Identification Number, so what we're actually saying is Personal Identification Number Number. Is there a reason for this? |
You are subscribed to email updates from Recent Questions - English Language & Usage Stack Exchange. To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States |
No comments:
Post a Comment