Monday, April 12, 2021

Recent Questions - English Language & Usage Stack Exchange

Recent Questions - English Language & Usage Stack Exchange


Is to be + verb-ing passive voice?

Posted: 12 Apr 2021 08:56 AM PDT

I am a university student. I submitted an essay and a professor told me I should avoid passive voice with examples. But that sounded weird to me. When I asked the professor about this, she sent me a reply as following:

Everyone is having [CH1] a hard time.
[CH1]Passive voice – try to avoid if possible. Rephrase to active

This is a complete sentence, but it is passive voice, because it combines a variant of the verb "to be" with another verb, in this case "is" + the verb "have".

So, you could make this more active by re-writing like so: Everyone has experienced a hard time. -or- Everyone has had a hard time.

Notice how the verb "to be" has been eliminated from this sentence.

Arendt also mentioned that he had no motives at all, but never realized what he was doing[CH1] , although it is still controversial if he really did not know what he was doing apart from no evil intention.
[CH1]PV

"was doing" is passive, because it mixes "was" + the verb "to do". You can rewrite to active llike so:

Arendt also mentioned that had no motives at all, but never realized what he had done, although controversy persists over whether he really did not know what he had done. Lankford (2009), however, argues that brutal behavior expressed by the soldiers is not [CH1] from their dispositions, but it is the result of systematic and situational factors. [CH1]Passive – can you rewrite to active?

Here, it's not technically passive voice, but the use of the verb "is" here is a bit weak. You can rewrite and make it more interesting by eliminating the verb "is": Lankford, however, argues that brutal behavior expressed by the soldiers derives not from their dispositions, but results from systematic and situational factors.

Isn't passive voice be + p.p.? I thought be + -ing was active voice. Is there something I don't know about passive voice? Should I avoid using to be verb in essay regardless of active or passive voice?

Clearer and beautiful way to express this phrase "intangible"

Posted: 12 Apr 2021 08:27 AM PDT

I am writing a personal essay and reach writer's block on this part

A simple app that could save my father's time convinced me of the potential of technology to not only improve the industry's productivity but also the intangible - precious time saved that could be spent with family.

  1. Grammatically is it correct?
  2. How to further improve on the "... intangible ..." to drive the sentence more expressive and impactful to the reader? Any adjective or words to replace or add?

Street Lamps go on - in other words? [closed]

Posted: 12 Apr 2021 08:12 AM PDT

How can I describe it more poetically? Street Lamps light on? Street Lamps flicker on? Street Lamps light up? Thanks!

and is street lamp the right word? Or would street lights etc be better?

Could we use 'lawn-proud' in the same sense as 'house-proud'?

Posted: 12 Apr 2021 10:26 AM PDT

The meaning of the term house-proud apparently has shifted, at least in the US, from meaning

very worried about your house being completely clean and tidy, and spending a lot of time making it so (Cambridge)

...which is how I think of it, to simply meaning

proud of one's house or housekeeping (M/W)

Given that, would it be a stretch to use the term lawn-proud to describe someone who obsesses over the state of their yard/garden? If it would not be generally understood in that sense, is there a word or a succinct phrase that would fit ?

What's a word for someone who only does what they enjoy? [duplicate]

Posted: 12 Apr 2021 08:15 AM PDT

Is there a single word for someone who only spends time doing things they like, and shirk their important duties? I am trying to describe Mr. Frederick from Animal Farm, who had "a large, neglected, old-fashioned farm, much overgrown by woodland, with all is pastures worn out and its hedges in a disgraceful condition." It is implied that the farm has gone to such a state because he "spent most of his time in fishing or hunting". I can't think of the right word to describe this, and I'm not even positive there is one. I also want something that emphasizes doing something you enjoy in place of work that needs to get done.

Word for how the white space between words can form patterns

Posted: 12 Apr 2021 09:30 AM PDT

Nota Bene: I included a term to describe this thing, but I'm not here to invent a word, it was included as a humorous nod; thank you for your patience and understanding!

I apologize if this is an odd one; I am aware of the word 'Pareidolia' but I'm wondering if there's a better word for the phenomenon I'm about to describe? Pareidolia being the tendency to (incorrectly?) see patterns in random things, like shapes in clouds or canals on Mars, etc...

I'm almost always using my Kindle (I prefer a good Paper book, but I'm partially disabled and a Kindle can carry my whole library without weighing anything) and and I am a fond reader of science and sci-fi, fantasy and historical fiction.

The escapism is a big relief for my physical condition. So when reading about the description of some event, I can often find myself day-dreaming, zoning out so that the words on the page can seem a little blurred, as I imagine the thing in my minds eye.

When this happens, I often notice that the white-space between letters can form patterns too, and I've trained to filter out the line height spacing. I often can see strong diagonal lines, misshaped circles and similar. Sometimes it can even look like a crude lightning strike! One could possibly stretch a metaphor to suggest that it's the prosaic equivalent of a Moiré pattern...?

I do know it is fundamentally caused by our brains innate ability to notice (or invent) patterns, but it's a beautiful and sometimes appropriate visualisation too.

For example, in one book was the description of an alien village with sloping conical towers as the buildings. On the same page, almost directly afterwards, the combination of white-space and letters made such an very obvious 70° slanted line, that I could easily envisage the sloping sides of the building being described!

This sites posting rules indicate that I should include an example, and I do recognise that this is essentially inverted ASCII Art, but that term itself has some negative connotations.. Besides which, that art style is forced, whereas the patterns I see are just the natural shapes formed by the gaps between words! The following example is obviously exaggerated and not well written, but you should see the "Eidolexis*"


It is a great Space Opera Trilogy        Profound and Inspiring  That said, I do use 4pt Amazon Ember       Bookerly didn't do much  Experiments show its better on ePaper       Web-Page Fonts can vary  This was seen in Peter F. Hamilton's        Sublime Nights Dawn Trilogy  There's a good description of a town       built by an Alien Species  Who've found a fruiting alien plant      inedible to man but for  The Tyrathca species palate fruit      was their version of Chocolate!  

I should re-iterate that changing the font-face or size completely ruined the illusion, so it was quite serendipitous! If the above pre-formatted text is garbled, basically I am describing: "This was in PF Hamilton's, Nights-Dawn trilogy Book 1, wherein he described the Tyrathca village on Lalonde where they farmed an Olive like fruit, Oily and disgusting to Humans, but like good chocolate to the Tyrathca"


So, In summary, Is there a better word for this experience?


I ask this, as truthfully, I don't really believe that it's an example of Pareidolia. Simply, the shapes are not being invented by the brain, they exist but are not always instantly obvious to the reader, they're waiting to be acknowledged!

I could easily imagine this as a visual art form, Imagine a Poem that describes a Thing™, but the layout of the words would describe the shape of the Thing™.

  • For the time being, I have coined the term 'Eidolexis' for this phenomena, but perhaps 'Lexeidolia'?. 'Pareidolexia' seems a bit too negative, as the shapes are indeed there!

What has caused the word bridegroom to mean groom and bride and groom to mean the bride and the groom? [closed]

Posted: 12 Apr 2021 04:28 AM PDT

What has caused the word bridegroom to mean groom, and bride and groom to mean a bride and groom? There isn't really anything else to the question.

Idiom meaning inferring too much from the available evidence

Posted: 12 Apr 2021 08:39 AM PDT

Suppose there is a little bit of evidence available, such as a red stain on the wall, and one starts to deduce "facts" from that, for example, that someone cut their finger by a knife yesterday morning near the wall (rather similar to Sherlock Holmes), though it can also be the case that someone pierced their finger by a lancet yesterday evening. In other words, rival theories are underdetermined by the available evidence.

Is there any idiom to describe the fact that he is "draining" too much from the evidence "well", or "milking" too much from the evidence "cow"?

'Less good' vs 'worse'

Posted: 12 Apr 2021 03:32 AM PDT

Garner's fourth , page 263, reads

Depend typically takes on (or, less good, upon). When a clausal complement follows the verb, to omit the on is a casualism—

Is good here an adverb?

Why not use worse instead of less good?

Is it she and James' or her and James'?

Posted: 12 Apr 2021 02:15 AM PDT

The sentence is— "Her and James' life shouldn't be a topic of discussion for them." I believe that it should be she and James' and not her James'. Which version of the sentence is correct? Please help me out, thank you.

Less intensive way of saying "negate/nullify"

Posted: 12 Apr 2021 04:27 AM PDT

I am trying to revise the following statement:

A negate/nullify the contribution of B.

The nullify or negate seems too strong. I want to imply the fact that A will make, say, 80% of B's contribution into zero. However, from what I can see, nullify/negate seems to imply that A will turn ALL B's contribution into zero.

Is there any other verb that can be properly used here?

A [verb] the contribution of B.

Thank you!

NPs containing double genitives: "this harassment of her of yours"

Posted: 12 Apr 2021 10:37 AM PDT

I am interested in which nominal phrases of the general form

Article + Noun + of + Accusative pronoun + of + Genitive pronoun  

sound more or less grammatical to most speakers. Primarily, what interests me about them (for those who accept them as fully idiomatic) is the restrictions over the admissible instances of Article and Noun. For instance, it seems that demonstrative determiners are OK (Kayne 1981 gives (1a) as an example) but definite articles aren't (1b). Also, besides event nominalizations like harassment, some nouns like picture (2a) appear to me to be more amenable to the construction than other nouns like story (2b).

(1a) this harassment of her of yours       ✓  (1b) the harassment of her of yours        ✗  (2a) two nude pictures of you of mine      ✓  (2b) two prison stories of you of mine     ✗   

Is this correct? Does anyone have any clue as to what may be going on here? My observations are super exploratory, so I'd really appreciate some external input/more examples to mull over.

American accents where /æ/ becomes [eɪ] before /ŋ/. Does /æ/ become [eɪ] before /m/ and /n/ too?

Posted: 12 Apr 2021 05:12 AM PDT

I know that in Californian accent, /æ/ is sometimes realized as [eɪ] only before /ŋ/. So words like hang, bang, rang, sang, gang, which normally end with /æŋ/, end with [eɪŋ]. The reason why it happens is usually attributed to the effect of the following "nasal" sound [ŋ], but I'm not certain about the reason. Also I have only heard it for words with /ŋ/, not other nasals.

I have two closely related questions (to which I didn't find an answer by searching cursorily):

  • Does /æ/ become [eɪ] before other nasals like /m/ and /n/? Or does it only happen before /ŋ/?
  • Is there any other American accent where /æ/ is realized as [eɪ] before nasals?

Can I use 'out of this world' negatively in a sentence

Posted: 12 Apr 2021 07:31 AM PDT

Can I say " their stupidity is out of this world. Its kinda amusing" ? And what are the other ways to say it

If I cannot win, then I will make it impossible for you to win

Posted: 12 Apr 2021 02:17 AM PDT

We have a joke about a foreigner that went to a wet market in zone 1 and saw a farmer selling live frogs in an open basket.

As we all know, frogs jump. Actually, they jump about quite a bit when in a confined space.

When the foreigner pointed that out and asked, "Aren't you worried these frogs will escape?" The farmer replied,

"No, sir. These are Mixcoan frogs, and if one looks like he is going to escape, well the rest pull him back in."

Another example could be seen in traffic.

Few drivers here use the directional signals when changing lanes. Why? Although covered ad nauseam on the Driver's test, it has become a "cultural" thing: basically people here do not like other people getting in front of them. It becomes a competition to see who can occupy that space first, and it turns into a Mario Andretti situation. Too often it ends when neither one can occupy the space and both drivers have actually missed their turn.

From halfway around the world, in Saudi Arabia, another example.

Someone told me about an experience they once had in Jeddah. He was waiting for someone on the main concourse, and positioned himself nicely near one of the columns in order to to protect his right hand. A Saudi local decided he also wanted to occupy that advantageous spot, and walked right up to my friend and tried to do a "face-off". They were pretty much nose-to-nose, and neither one backed down.

The result was they both missed their arriving pick-ups.

"cutting off a nose to spite a face"

...is too broad.

So, is there an expression that means

If I cannot win, then I will make it impossible for you to win?

EDIT

Dog in a manger

was suggested: however that means something else.

Interpreted variously over the centuries, the metaphor is now used to speak of one who spitefully prevents others from having something for which one has no use.

My examples exclude "having something for which one has no use."

All the frogs want to escape. All the drivers want to get ahead. All couriers want to do their pick-up.

It is their overly-competitive attitude towards each other that prevents them from winning.

Word for simultaneously smiling at something heartwarming and exhaling air involuntarily

Posted: 12 Apr 2021 05:01 AM PDT

What is the word or phrase for that action when someone smiles at something heartwarming and exhales air involuntarily at the same time? It's not a laugh or even a chuckle, more like a hum with no vocalization.

Do I need to use a comma before "but" in these examples?

Posted: 12 Apr 2021 07:06 AM PDT

  1. Pull you in, but don't you get too close
  2. Love you now, but not tomorrow
  3. Wrong to steal, but not to borrow
  4. Pull you in, but don't you get too close

What's the opposite of "grow up" when used as an interjection?

Posted: 12 Apr 2021 01:54 AM PDT

In casual conversation, one is often told to "Grow up!", ie be more mature and more like an adult. What would be the most accurate phrase to express the opposite sentiment - you need to loosen up, embrace your inner child, appreciate the fun in activities usually seen as frivolous, etc?

  • "Grow down" is humorous but I'm not sure if it's correct, and it's definitely not widely used.
  • "Loosen up" works but doesn't have quite the same "child-like" connotation.
  • "Relax", "chill" and other such common words also fall in the same category, but don't express a need for childishness.

Hours or the hours?

Posted: 12 Apr 2021 09:06 AM PDT

I would like to ask a question. Which sentence is correct?

Yes, we can change hours Or Yes, we can change the hours

Is only one answer correct or both are depending on the context?

A word that's between 'recommended' and 'awarded'?

Posted: 12 Apr 2021 06:01 AM PDT

Is there a word that is between 'recommended' and 'awarded', take for example:

The boss recommended the Prize to Jill.

and

The boss awarded the Prize to Jill.

I don't want it to be emphasized that the boss is the only one gave it to her, but the truth is, the boss is the only one who gave it to her.

I wish for a sense that it was agreed upon to give Jill the award without saying 'the department'.

Any comments?

"We merely skimmed the surface of the cities." Does this make sense?

Posted: 12 Apr 2021 03:01 AM PDT

Does that make sense to describe how our travel was rushed therefore couldn't fully enjoy what the cities have to offer?

Skill to Hindcast

Posted: 12 Apr 2021 02:44 AM PDT

I wonder whether it's correct to say hindcastive, similarly to what we do with predictive to denote the ability to predict. If not, what would be an equivalent term? possibly:

  • retrodictive (in the OED)
  • back-casting
  • retrospective forecasting

NB: the term isn't even listed in the OED, unlike in Webster's, but it's known in scientific literature.

Thanks!

Why can't we say "sign in into"?

Posted: 12 Apr 2021 02:03 AM PDT

When it comes to the sentence Sign in to your account, I understand why it is more proper to say sign in to as opposed to sign into. Sign in is a phrasal verb and to is the preposition.

However, I cannot find the proper explanation as to why it's improper to say sign in into your account.

My partner and I are both engineers, so his argument is that when you sign in, you are in fact going INTO an account. This just does not sit right with me, but I cannot put into words why.

Also, would the sentence Sign in to mywebsite change anything? Sign into mywebsite? Sign in into mywebsite?

The meaning of "upon one"

Posted: 12 Apr 2021 02:38 AM PDT

What is the meaning of "upon me" in the following excerpt of one of Whitman's poems? Dictionaries don't help in this case.

Strong upon me the life that does not exhibit itself, yet contains all the rest,

What I guess is he means "the life that doesn't exhibit itself is strong and sits by me".

A word for one who has the ability to sleep almost instantly

Posted: 12 Apr 2021 10:56 AM PDT

I am looking for a word to describe a person that can fall asleep 'as their head hits the pillow'.

To add context: my wife falls asleep seconds after she decides that she wants to sleep. Not just in bed, but on the sofa, on the train - almost anywhere where there is a relatively comfortable place to sleep. Even on a moving escalator. She is a person who I consider to be happy and at peace with herself. I mention this as I am not looking for a term to describe someone with a medical condition with no control over when they sleep.

Would do that or would have done it?

Posted: 12 Apr 2021 04:04 AM PDT

Is there a situation in which following sentence is correct?

"You could have mentioned you would do that"

If so, then in which context is it right? I mean, if the sentence is started by "could have" then the next part should contain "have" after "would" in this case? Is this a rule or does it all depend on the situation in which you're using it? And if so, please present me the right context.

Academic name for graphs which curve like a bridge

Posted: 12 Apr 2021 04:31 AM PDT

These are the images of the graphs I want to know the academic names:

bell-shaped curve upside down bell-shaped curve

I've googled and learnt that their names are Concave Down Curve and Concave Up Curve. However, I want to know if there are any other names for these graphs as I want to use them in a sentence like:

"The sales from 2011 to 2017 resembles a concave down curve with the lowest point being 2015 at 20,356 sales"

Edit 1: Guys, thank you for your inputs. However, my question was not that related to math, but was to find a good descriptive sentence for my IELTS writing. Here is the graph I came across in the test:

bar chart image taken from IELTS Writing task 1 paper

I noticed that, as people get older, women tend to do more exercises, and then less, their trend shapes like a bridge, while a reversion of that can be seen in men. Now, if I were to compare these two trends while trying to sound academic, should I write something similar to the following?

"A demographic trend which resembles a concave down curve can be seen in women's figures while it is the opposite for men's"

Could you guys give me a more well structured and better sentence without sacrificing the "concave down curve or u-shaped curve" because I really want to include those terms.

Around how old is "a woman of a certain age"?

Posted: 12 Apr 2021 06:38 AM PDT

"A woman of a certain age" is a common saying.

It means more than "a woman of a given age", "a woman who could be any age" or "female, without respect to age". It's usage instead seems to suggest a much more specific period of life.

Around what age is a woman "of a certain age"?

Valid? "The river is flowing."

Posted: 12 Apr 2021 02:25 AM PDT

What is the meaning of the "the river is flowing?" Is this valid usage?

Websters, #2: River: A large quantity of a flowing substance

The river is already a flow by definition. Can the river be "not flowing?"

Should one stick to American style of placing punctuation marks within quotes if one uses the American spelling?

Posted: 12 Apr 2021 09:52 AM PDT

According to Wikipedia, there are two ways to use punctation marks when it comes to quoting. Basically, we have the British style, where punctation marks that don't come from the quoted material "is put outside the quote", like I just did. In the American style, on the other hand, punctation marks that belongs to the original sentence, that the quoted material is put within, should be "placed within the quote itself," like I just did.

Now, I really, really, prefer the British style, since this is the way I've always done it, including when I write in my native language. However, at the same time, I prefer to use the american spelling and usage of words. Is this mixing behavior on my part acceptable?

It is mentioned in the Wikipedia article linked to above that "many American style guides specific to certain specialties, such as legal writing and linguistics, prefer British style." However, is there a general rule (or maybe a strong recommendation), for example if I'm just writing an essay or, I don't know, a blogpost, regarding how I can mix the different spellings and punctation mark rules?

No comments:

Post a Comment